Exhibit Guide Home

Exhibits
Introduction
Founding Generation
Founding Documents
You Be the Judge
Defining Freedom
The Struggle Continues
Faces of Freedom
Marketplace of Ideas
Censorship: What Is It?
Musical Hit List
Draw the Line


Resources
Museum Map
Glossary




Mary Beth Tinker, 13. Bridget Mergens, 18.

What do these two names have in common? These young women fought for their First Amendment rights before the United States Supreme Court.

The First Amendment and Bill of Rights were written in a way that has left it up to the people and courts to figure out the boundaries of our rights. People of all ages and backgrounds are involved in these court cases, which look at whether certain rights should be expanded or restricted. Sometimes there are so many questions and different decisions by lower courts on similar situations, that they reach the Supreme Court for interpretation.

Although judges are supposed to be objective in their judicial decisions, just like us, their experiences and views are influenced by societal values and attitudes of that time period. An older Supreme Court case from decades ago may be decided differently if it were before the court today. Courts occasionally overturn their previous decisions. Court rulings and judges’ written opinions have a huge impact on how the people and other branches of government interpret our rights.

Find out how Mary Beth Tinker, Bridget Mergens and others tested the boundaries of the First Amendment before the Supreme Court, and how their actions helped shape history.


Speech
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Mary Beth Tinker, 13, was opposed to the Vietnam War. To express her views she and other students decided they would wear black armbands with the peace sign to protest the war. They wore the armbands to school and were suspended. Find out how Mary Beth Tinker's case still affects students today. Learn more
Religion
Westside School District v. Mergens (1990)
Bridget Mergens, 18, wanted to form a Christian club at her high school in Omaha, Nebraska. The principal denied the request, so Mergens and other students appealed to the school board. The school board upheld the principal’s decision, but this wasn’t the end of the story. Learn more

Press
New York Times v. Sullivan (1964)
On March 29, 1960, the New York Times printed a full-page advertisement alleging that the recent arrest of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., in Alabama was intended to hamper the civil rights struggle. The advertisement did not mention anyone by name but contained several factual errors. Find out how this case affects freedom of press and the Internet today. Learn more
Assembly
Gregory v. Chicago (1969)
On August 2, 1965 a group of demonstrators—including comedian Dick Gregory—marched to the home of Chicago Mayor Richard Daley to protest segregation of the city’s public schools. A large crowd of spectators began threatening the demonstrators and throwing rocks and eggs. Find out what happened next. Learn more



Petition
Brown v. Louisiana (1966)
On Saturday, March 7, 1964 five African-American men entered a segregated library in Clinton, Louisiana. The library was part of the Audubon Regional Library system, which did not allow blacks into any of its library branches. A library assistant asked the men to leave. They sat down and remained. The assistant called the sheriff. Find out what happened next. Learn more





<< Previous Section    Next section >>



Onboard the
Freedom Express



This touch-screen interactive allows visitors to learn the facts surrounding five landmark First Amendment cases. Visitors assume the role of a Supreme Court justice, analyzing the facts of the case before handing down a ruling.





The U.S. Supreme Court
Supreme Court Website

The Supreme Court series
PBS.org

Supreme Court summary briefs database
Oyez.org, Illinois Institute of Technology

Landmark Supreme Court cases: Students
U.S. Courts.gov

FAQs for student speech
American Civil Liberties Union

Game: Supreme Decision
iCivics.org

People Magazine’s profile on Bridget Mergens
People’s Magazine

High court won't review ruling on student group funding
First Amendment Center